Bipin shantilal panchal v state of gujarat

Author: yuvn

August undefined, 2024

WebFeb 22, 2001 · Respondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8.11.1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing of a further huge quantity of Mandrex tablets which, added with the earlier interception, is quantified at about 2000 Kgs. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Ahmedabad filed … WebMay 3, 2024 · In the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, ... The Hon’ble Court considered the mandate of Bipin Shantilal (supra) and observed …

Bipin Shantilal Panchal v/s State of Gujarat - LawyerServices

WebNov 9, 2024 · Respondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8-11-1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing … WebSep 7, 1998 · Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1...that even the Law Commission in its 157th report did not recommend any change in law of evidence. … china training shorts

bipin+panchal Indian Case Law Law CaseMine

WebIn the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, practices with respect to objections regarding questions to be put to witnesses were enunciated and it was directed that the Court must record answers to all questions, regardless of objections. However, this may lead to prolonged and lengthy cross examination, and more ... WebJan 25, 2024 · The petitioner’s counsel argued against the order. Per Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat & Anr (2001 3 SCC 1), the learned ASJ should record any objection as to the admissibility of the video CD containing the interview. But, in the current case, the learned ASJ failed to do so. WebSep 7, 1998 · BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL V. STATE OF GUJARAT reported in (2001) 3 S.C.C. 1, wherein it is held as follows: " When so recast, the practice which can be a better substitute...of oral evidence." 5. 5. Applying the above ratio laid down by the Apex Court in BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL V. STATE OF GUJARAT reported in (2001) 3 S.C.C. 1, … china trains schedule

Prakash Oil Corporation And Another v. Brij Kishan

Law Web: Whether memory card produced by accused during …

WebJan 20, 2024 · Bipin Shantilal Panchal Vs State of Gujarat and Anr on 22 February, 2001. In this landmark judgment, Supreme Court of India had formulated the following procedure while questions are put to witness during cross-examination. Also, per 138 Evidence Act, ‘ Chief examination and cross-examination must relate to relevant facts, but cross ... WebFeb 22, 2001 · Respondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8.11.1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing … china train soft sleeperWebBesides this, the case also overruled Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat. The decision in that case had held that objections to admission of evidence should not be … china training vss usa training

"" - Bipin shantilal panchal v state of gujarat

Bipin shantilal panchal v state of gujarat

Ramniklal Shivlal Bavishi Since Deceased v/s Tulsidas Chakubhai ...

WebApr 20, 2024 · It was pointed out by learned amici that the practice adopted predominantly in all trials is guided by the decision of this court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat 4 with respect to objections regarding questions to be put to witnesses. WebApr 27, 2024 · State of Gujarat [Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 417] , deprecated the practice in respect of the admissibility of any material evidence, where the Court does not proceed further without passing order on such objection. It was held that all objections raised shall be decided by the Court at the ...

Did you know?

WebSaji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam. Courts adjudicate matters on the basis of and evidence before it. Such evidence must will relevant and admissible. Significance von Evidence Sec. 5 additionally 136 of the Evidence Act stipulate that evidence can be given only on ‘facts in issue’ alternatively ‘relevant facts’. Important facts are numeric in Second. 6 onwards.… WebGujarat High Court Judgename :C.K.BUCH BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL - Appellant Versus STATE - Respondent CRI.M.A. 6523 of 2000 Decided On : 05/01/2001 …

WebAug 6, 2015 · The trial court after considering the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the respective parties, was of the view that when an objection has been raised to exhibiting the document, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, 2001 (2) GLH 545, the question as regards the ... WebFeb 22, 2001 · No.223 of 2000. (From the Judgment and Order dated 29.10.1999 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 2898 of 1999 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) Petitioner: Bipin Shantilal Panchal. Respondent: State of Gujarat and Anr. Apeal: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.862 of 2001.

WebA latest precedent in this regard has been laid down in M/S SMS TEA ESTATES P.LTD v. M/S CHANDMARI TEA CO. P.LTD. (2011) 14 SCC 6 ... which could be decided at the later stage while hearing the case as guided by the Apex Court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat and Anr. (2001) 3 SCC 1. WebAs the petitioner Bipin Panchal had approached the Apex Court against the order passed by this Court, he has agitated bail plea again before this Court and petitioner Achint …

WebOct 27, 2024 · On the nature of the cross examination permitted under Section 138 of the Evidence Act, the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4, 7 to 10 relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, Judgment and order dated 13.1.2024 passed by this Court in the case …

http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/bipin-shantilal-panchal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-anr china trangender newsWeb15 bipin shantilal panchal vs state of gujarat & another. (2001) 3 scc 1 16 geeta marine services vs. state. 2009 cri.l.j. 910. 17 surender bala vs sandeep foam industries pvt. ltd. air 2000 delhi 300. 18 state (delhi administration) vs. virender kumar & ors. in the high court of delhi in crl .a. no.244 of 1987 judgment delivered on june 11th ... china trains soft sleeperWebMay 1, 2001 · As the petitioner Bipin Panchal had approached the Apex Court against the order passed by this Court, he has agitated bail plea again before this Court and … china train tickets online bookinghttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/bipin-shantilal-panchal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-anr china trampoline olympicsWebMay 20, 2024 · The Amici Curiae pointed that the practice of recording answers to all questions regardless of objections to the questions, as was directed in matter titled as … gram wax containersWebApr 21, 2024 · It was pointed out by learned amici that the practice adopted predominantly in all trials is guided by the decision of this court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v.State of Gujarat (2001) 3 SCC 1 with respect to objections regarding questions to be put to witnesses. This court had termed the practice of deciding the objections, immediately as … gramworkx agrotech private limitedWeb1996(1) Supreme 279 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA A.M. Ahmadi, CJI, B.P. Jeevan Reddy & N.P. Singh, JJ. Dr. Bipin Shantilal Panchal -Appellant versus State of Gujarat … china trains hard sleeper