WebbBasically, the argument goes as follows: P1. Necessarily * If gratuitous evil exists, God doesn't exist. P2. If God exists, He exists necessarily (i.e. in all possible worlds). P3. Gratuitous evil is possible (i.e. it exists in some possible world). 4. There exists a possible world where God doesn't exist (from P1 and P3). 5. Webb1 mars 2024 · One of the earliest ontological arguments, in defense of the de facto existence of God, is that of Anselm of Canterbury (St. Anselm). As of today, it is being often referred to as such that contributed rather substantially towards the theological legitimization of Christianity during the Dark Ages.
Philosophy of Religion - PHILOSOPHY DUNGEON
WebbThe famous scholar Karl Barth suggest that the Anselm's ontological argument is not an attempt to persuade atheists to believe in God. Barth argues that it is a devotional … Webb1 jan. 2024 · Chapter III of Anselm's Proslogionis quite naturally interpreted as presenting a second version of the ontological argument (the first version having been presented in Chapter II). In recent discussions it has been so interpreted by Charles Hartshorne and by Norman Malcolm. greater phoenix convention \u0026 visitors bureau
Religious philosophy - Wikipedia
WebbToday we are introducing a new area of philosophy – philosophy of religion. We are starting this unit off with Anselm’s argument for God’s existence, while also considering objections to that... Webb23 feb. 2024 · What is an Ontological Argument? An ontological argument is an argument that states that God must exists because a God who exits must be greater than one who does not. Philosophers... WebbOntological Argument. The philosophers who criticise these arguments include: David Hume, Immanuel Kant, Richard Dawkins, Bertrand Russell and J.L. Mackie himself. In the … greater phoenix digital library/libby